| | | |
Home /
Object hierarchy
Uploading ....
There probably is "an infinite hierarchy of levels in between" the object classes, and the number of levels is limited by man's perception, and his need to limit the number of object classes to some workable number.
Current theory (Dirac) allows for a jump between null and fermions, and more precisely the electron.
There is enough information floating around to describe several other "fields" F(N) along with the field's associated "property" P(N). (For complex molecules, planetary systems, galaxies, etc.)
And no doubt, the central features, of all sets of objects are nebulous things, that are constantly shifting.
For example, man's definition of the set mankind, is subject to drift.
This drift would, in affect, fill in between any two set definitions fixed at some point in time and space, and smear object sets into a continuum.
Certain bipolar properties are minimized in each object class ( For example charge in atoms, and magnetic moment in nuclei.) and this suggests that even the most fundamental objects that we can perceive arise in bipolar pairs, as Dirac indicated.
It is easy to imagine a population of objects becoming extinct, or an object combining with an "anti-object" and converted into pure space, but it is hard to imagine how a population of objects arises from nothing.
-- Tom Potter
http://www.tompotter.us
|
|
|
| | | |
|